JAMA Surgery (Article #1)

JAMA Surgery | Original Investigation | September 20, 2017

Association of Prehospital Mode of Transport With Mortality in Penetrating Trauma
A Trauma System-Level Assessment of Private Vehicle Transportation vs. Ground Emergency Medical Services

Michael W. Wandling, MD, MS
Avery B. Nathens, MD, PhD
Michael B. Shapiro, MD
Elliott R. Haut, MD, PhD

The Question – Does ground emergency medical services transport confer a survival advantage vs. private vehicle transport for patients with penetrating injuries?

The Findings In this cohort study of 103,029 patients, individuals transported by private vehicle were significantly less likely to die that similarly injured patients transported by ground emergency medical services, even when controlling for injury severity.

What Does This Mean? Ground emergency medical services transport is not associated with improved survival compared with private vehicle transport among patients with penetrating injuries in urban trauma systems, suggesting prehospital trauma care may have a limited role in this subset of patients.

Comments – Following risk adjustment, individuals with penetrating injuries transported by private vehicle were less likely to die than patients transported by ground EMS (odds ratio [OR], 0.38; 95% CI, 0.31-0.47).

FULL ARTICLE: http://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamasurgery/fullarticle/2654239


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s